Logo

Articles

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): International Journal of Healthcare and Education

Determinants of Student-Centered Learning (SCL) Practice in English Language Courses Among Indonesian University Students

Submitted
June 12, 2025
Published
2025-06-30

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the transition from teacher-centered to student-centered learning (SCL), a method shown to enhance academic outcomes.

Objective: This study aimed to identify factors associated with SCL practices during English language courses among university students in Indonesia.

Methods: A cross-sectional quantitative study was conducted with 56 university students recruited via online convenience sampling. Instruments included demographic data, the SCL Fun Chemistry scale, and the Tuckman Procrastination Scale. Linear regression was used to assess associations.

Results: The average age was 20.3 years (SD = 1.4); most participants were female (83.9%) and in their second year of study (73.2%). A significant association was found between academic grade and SCL practice (β = 2.05, p = 0.05). No significant associations were observed for procrastination or other demographic factors.

Conclusion: Higher academic grade level is associated with greater adoption of SCL during English courses. These findings support integrating active learning strategies tailored to student readiness.

References

  1. Afrizal. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
  2. Andiwatir, A., Nay, F. A., & Talan, R. (2021). Model Pembelajaran SCL (Student Center Learning) pada Siswa Lamban Belajar (Slow Learner) Sekolah Menengah Pertama. PEMBELAJAR: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Keguruan, Dan Pembelajaran, 5(2), 117–122.
  3. Charlton, B. G. (2006). Lectures are such an effective teaching method because they exploit evolved human psychology to improve learning. In Medical Hypotheses (Vol. 67, Issue 6, pp. 1261–1265). Elsevier.
  4. Idris, O. A. S. (2016). Investigating Instructors’ Perspectives towards Student-Centered Learning in Teaching English. American Journal of Educational Research, 4(20), 1317–1322.
  5. Killen, R. (2000). Outcomes-based education: Principles and possibilities. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Newcastle, Faculty of Education, 1–24.
  6. Norwood, R. N. (2004). Perceptions of student-centered learning in a preservice education program. Wichita State University.
  7. Sugiyono. (2008). Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. CV. Alfabeta, Bandung.
  8. Sukendro, S., & Yuliawan, E. (2021). Upaya Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Atletik Menggunakan Pendekatan Metode Student Centered Learning (SCL) Model Case Method pada Mahasiswa Porkes FKIP UNJA. Cerdas Sifa Pendidikan, 10(2), 90–98.
  9. Syakur, A., Zainuddin, H. M., & Hasan, M. A. (2020). Needs analysis English for specific purposes (esp) for vocational pharmacy students. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 3(2), 724–733.
  10. Todorovski, B., Nordal, E., & Isoski, T. (2015). Overview on Student-Centered Learning in Higher Education in Europe: Research Study. European Students’ Union.
  11. Wessels, A., Fries, S., Horz, H., Scheele, N., & Effelsberg, W. (2007). Interactive lectures: Effective teaching and learning in lectures using wireless networks. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2524–2537.
  12. Yang, Y.-T. C., Chuang, Y.-C., Li, L.-Y., & Tseng, S.-S. (2013). A blended learning environment for individualized English listening and speaking integrating critical thinking. Computers & Education, 63, 285–305.